Non-compliance and utter disregard of Sarbanes-Oxley law, is in fact criminal. Understanding the requirements of that law, is part of the due diligence required to operate a business, ANY business. Now pile on that this man and his parents make up the number 2 biggest democratic donors and we have fracturing of campaign finance laws, and possible money laundering. Next add on, that while he has been out on bail these last few days, he has been actively draining the Alameda wallets that they did not turn over to the new management - which is a further violation of asset seizure laws in bankruptcy court and criminal violation for even touching the monies in the Alameda wallets.
It's possible, but I don't know why DOJ would want that. Usually you would welcome the idea of the defendant testifying under oath - it could be an invaluable source of leads and evidence. Any competent lawyer would tell him not to do it or to take the 5th, but it sounds like he was going to go forward.
Because the DOJ is completely corrupted under present leadership, just as the FBI and any other three letter federal agency-weaponized to work against truth, protected from any honest disclosures. SBF met privately with senior WH officials and Gary Gensler prior to the FTX collapse. None of the substance of those meeting has been made public and no one in the media is even asking about what was said, so there you go - a big fat smoking gun, among many!
Non-compliance and utter disregard of Sarbanes-Oxley law, is in fact criminal. Understanding the requirements of that law, is part of the due diligence required to operate a business, ANY business. Now pile on that this man and his parents make up the number 2 biggest democratic donors and we have fracturing of campaign finance laws, and possible money laundering. Next add on, that while he has been out on bail these last few days, he has been actively draining the Alameda wallets that they did not turn over to the new management - which is a further violation of asset seizure laws in bankruptcy court and criminal violation for even touching the monies in the Alameda wallets.
Randall this is excellent. I know you're still on Twitter, but I would like to put a link on Mastodon.
Thank you for this. Much appreciated.
Are you on Mastodon so I can tag you?
Hi Teri. I am not, but if you want to share it there that would be great. Thanks!
Done.
Could the timing of the indictment have been to prevent him from testifying before congress?
It's possible, but I don't know why DOJ would want that. Usually you would welcome the idea of the defendant testifying under oath - it could be an invaluable source of leads and evidence. Any competent lawyer would tell him not to do it or to take the 5th, but it sounds like he was going to go forward.
Because the DOJ is completely corrupted under present leadership, just as the FBI and any other three letter federal agency-weaponized to work against truth, protected from any honest disclosures. SBF met privately with senior WH officials and Gary Gensler prior to the FTX collapse. None of the substance of those meeting has been made public and no one in the media is even asking about what was said, so there you go - a big fat smoking gun, among many!