Non-compliance and utter disregard of Sarbanes-Oxley law, is in fact criminal. Understanding the requirements of that law, is part of the due diligence required to operate a business, ANY business. Now pile on that this man and his parents make up the number 2 biggest democratic donors and we have fracturing of campaign finance laws, and possible money laundering. Next add on, that while he has been out on bail these last few days, he has been actively draining the Alameda wallets that they did not turn over to the new management - which is a further violation of asset seizure laws in bankruptcy court and criminal violation for even touching the monies in the Alameda wallets.
Unpacking the SBF Indictment
Non-compliance and utter disregard of Sarbanes-Oxley law, is in fact criminal. Understanding the requirements of that law, is part of the due diligence required to operate a business, ANY business. Now pile on that this man and his parents make up the number 2 biggest democratic donors and we have fracturing of campaign finance laws, and possible money laundering. Next add on, that while he has been out on bail these last few days, he has been actively draining the Alameda wallets that they did not turn over to the new management - which is a further violation of asset seizure laws in bankruptcy court and criminal violation for even touching the monies in the Alameda wallets.
Randall this is excellent. I know you're still on Twitter, but I would like to put a link on Mastodon.
Thank you for this. Much appreciated.
Could the timing of the indictment have been to prevent him from testifying before congress?