3 Comments

Excellent analysis! Just because she promised a RICO case doesn’t mean she should have brought it. Evidence is powerful and overwhelming that several serious crimes were committed. But the vessel chosen to put those charges has to float. Nice job of highlighting the leaks! A simple criminal conspiracy count or perhaps 3 separate conspiracy charges (all coupled with substantive offenses) based on particular events would have been more prudent as you highlight. Thanks for sharing!

Expand full comment
author

Thank you!

Expand full comment

Great work, as always. Love reading your takes. But, I have to say, I'm bumping on the conclusion overall. Standing back and looking at all of these individuals and the myriad actions taken, there is a basic and cogent explanation for what happened. Each defendant and each action taken focused on a common purpose. Keeping Trump in power. As simple as that. The criticisms about subplots and tangential actors could all be raised when the prosecution is against other organized crime, such as the mafia. But they're all in on it, and all committed to the common purpose. It is organized crime.

Expand full comment